Iraqis abandon their homes in Middle East's new refugee exodus
Iraq is experiencing the largest human exodus in the Middle East since the Nakba in which Palestinians were forced to flee their homes and country before the formation of Israel.
This human catastrophe is one of the least discussed aspects of Bush and Blair's misguided war in Iraq. The United Nations High Commission for Refugees said 50,000 Iraqis a month are abandoning their homes. That is an astonishing figure that it is only possible to overlook because the appalling violence on the Iraqi streets commands more of the media's attention.
They flee because they are in fear for their lives, with many leaving after receiving death threats.
Some 3,000 Iraqis are being killed every month according to the UN. Most come from Baghdad and the centre of the country, but all of Iraq outside the three Kurdish provinces in the north is extremely violent. A detailed survey by the International Organisation for Migration on displacement within Iraq said that most people move after direct threats to their lives: "These threats take the form of abductions; assassinations of individuals or their families."And, of course, the irony is that the more of them flee the more that sectarian violence can begin to take the form of mortar attacks as rivals can attack each others community's safe in the knowledge that they are unlikely to kill members of their own community.
It is all part of the bigger picture which is the complete disintegration of Iraq.
The fastest growing refugee crisis in the world is taking place and both the US and UK refuse to accept it is happening as it is counter to their propagandist version of events.The most common destinations are Jordan and Syria which have taken 1.6 million people. At first it was the better-off who fled, including half of Iraq's 34,000 doctors. Now it is the poor who are arriving in Amman and Damascus with little means of surviving.
Only Syria has formally recognised a need for temporary protection for Iraqis. Others, including the US and UK, are loath to admit that one of the world's great man-made disasters is taking place. The UNHCR thinks every Iraqi should qualify as a refugee because of the extraordinary level of violence in the country. "This is the fastest-growing refugee crisis in the world," Kenneth Bacon, president of Refugees International told the US Senate Judiciary Committee.
Remember when both the US and UK used to claim that we were going into Iraq to help the Iraqi people?
Now, as their country and their cities become too dangerous for them to live in, we refuse to accept that this humanitarian crisis is upon us.
Some do not run fast enough. Ali, a Shia businessman who also had a job with the government, was slow to abandon his fine house in a Sunni part of west Baghdad. One day he was picked up by a gang, whipped and only released when he had handed over all his money. "The kidnappers told me to leave the country," he said."
But not all succeed in getting out of the country. The land routes to Jordan and Syria run through Sunni territory. Shia trying to reach safety have been taken from their vehicles to be shot by the side of the road. But Shia can move to safety in south Iraq and therefore make up the bulk of the internally displaced.
For Sunni there is no real place of safety in Iraq. In Baghdad they are being squeezed into smaller and smaller areas. Cities like Ramadi and Fallujah are partly ruined and very dangerous. Mohammed Sahib Ali, 48, a government employee, was forced out of the al-Hurriyah area by Shia militiamen. A Sunni, he took refuge in a school in Salah ad-Din province. "We are dying here," said Ali. "Not enough food, not enough medicines. I can't go to work and my three sons can't attend their classes. We don't know what to do."
I remember, shortly after Paul Wolfowitz was made President of the World Bank, thinking that an historic opportunity had been lost. The people who championed this illegal war have been allowed to waltz away from it's consequences almost guilt free. As Iraq collapses into ruin I think those who supported the invasion should be made to put right the wrong that they supported.
I'd start by making Paul Wolfowitz Mayor of Baghdad. Perle can have Tikrit.
Real people are suffering real consequences as a result of the fantasies of these neo-con lunatics. And not one of them, to my knowledge, has paid any price for the fantastically bad advice they have given. Nor has any one of them ever expressed any real contrition for what they have done. Oh, they have sought to distance themselves by claiming that the war has been badly managed, but not one of them has ever admitted that they were wrong to support the war in the first place.
I'd ship the lot of them to Iraq and not allow them to come home until they had sorted the mess they helped to create.
Click title for full article.
tag: Iraq, Iraq war, refugee crisis, exodus, Nakba, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, snark
5 comments:
Well as long as israel has 'The Right to Exist' everything else is secondary. I was 17 when civil war broke out in Lebanon. As a family we were separated for few months. My father refused to live the house because empty houses were occupied. Eventually we managed to return to live in the house together but my two brothers (14 and 15) were sent outside the country, out of fear on our part of being drafted into the local Phalange militia. Civil war is all about that, the misery of ordinary people taken hostages to extremists fed and manipulated by arms traders, outside interests. Civil war is a hell and it has the ncapacity to leave permanent scars in every family.
Sophia,
I really believe that this is why the Iraq war was fought. The neo-cons were determined to ensure that Israel was left as a regional superpower - like she wasn't that already!
And what's astonishing is that it looks like they might be attempting to push for action in Iran as well.
And thanks for giving your personal perspective of a civilian living through a civil war. As you say, the Iraq civil war is scarring families.
And this aspect of this war has been all but ignored by the mainstream press.
I agree that it is an zionist project to fragment the ME into samll nations. This way Israel will feel 'secure' in its grip on the region. However, this is a project doomed for failure. If you look at the mosaic of the ME, you will realise that different sects and ethnies have always lived together. Sectarianism can be exacerbated in a time of war and scarcity but the natural state of things for Arabs from different sects is to live together. I watched this dynamic in lebanon. After the civil war, people returned to live together as before. And you know what ? During the height of the civil war, the Pahlanges militia, now merged with the lebanese forces, was killing Muslims on the basis of their religion while its political chief was delivering safe permits for his colleagues and the rest of the Muslim politcal establishment. This means that ordinary people are armed, pushed into fighting by a process of polarisation and radicalisation suppressing moderates and terrorising, while the leaders play their game of power. The ME is unlike part of Europe which broke down in samll nations, people across the ME, from all religions, have a common history which goes back to the event of Islam. So even if they break the ME apart, there will be fighting to bring it together again...
Here is an article I read a while ago about the zionist project for dividing the ME into small ethnic and religious states
Thanks for that Sophia,
I was aware of that article and had read it before with great interest. It certainly explains a lot of what I see happening regarding US interests and Israeli interests vis a vis the Middle East.
Post a Comment