Thursday, August 17, 2006

Anger at ceasefire sparks inquiry

The Israeli defence minister, Amir Peretz, has had to appoint a former army chief to conduct an inquiry into Israel's conduct during it's 34 day campaign in Lebanon. This comes amidst growing discontent amongst the Israeli electorate over the way the war was conducted.

A majority - 57%, according to the mass-circulation daily Yedioth Aronoth - want Mr Peretz to resign. Some 41% believe the prime minister, Ehud Olmert, should quit.

Seventy per cent of Israelis said they disagreed with the government's decision to accept the ceasefire without the return of two Israeli soldiers captured by Hizbullah in a cross-border raid on July 12, a poll in the Maariv newspaper showed. Only 40% said they were pleased with Mr Olmert's performance, down from nearly 80% in July. Nearly half - 49% - believe Mr Olmert was responsible for Israeli failings during the conflict.

This contrasts sharply with the post war reaction of Hizbullah who have pledged to rebuild southern Lebanon and have promised a years rent and a new set of furniture for every family who's house has been destroyed.

The promise was made by Hizbullah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, within hours of Monday's ceasefire.

The housing scheme will benefit 15,000 families, Mr Nasrallah said, and will cost up to $150m, according to one estimate. Funding will come from oil-rich Iran, which until now has mostly supplied Hizbullah with thousands of missiles used against Israel.

The reaction of the two camps seems to uphold the world's view that Hizbullah have achieved a great victory here, rather than President Bush's deluded claims that Israel have had some form of military success.

I have argued that Israel should use this as a moment to seek negotiation with the Arab world and to, finally, resolve the issues that have festered since 1967.

It appears that Assad of Syria has the same idea.
Assad said that the United States' plan for a "new Middle East" has collapsed after what he described as Hezbollah's success in fighting against Israel, and warned Israel to seek peace or risk defeat in the future.

"They should know that they are before a historic crossroads. Either they move toward peace and the return of [Arab] rights, or they move in the direction of continued instability until one generation decides the matter," he said.
I've always thought that this could be a moment of real breakthrough in the Middle East. However, it will require an acknowledgement of what has actually taken place rather than the fantasy being propagated by the neo-cons.

Click title for full article.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The reaction to the cease fire in Israel and by the Hisbollah and their supporters is another indication of poor judgement by the Israeli government.

The first misstep was the conduct of the war. The indiscriminate bombardment of Lebanon and he disproportion use of force, which caused a high death toll and massive suffering amongst the Lebanese civilians. This caused the Israelis to lose support in the public mind around the world and increased the pressure from the international community to end the conflict.

Ending the conflict short of achieving their goal of disarming the Hisbollah is now costing the government support at home.

The fact that only the Hisbollah and not Israel pledged aid to the victims (which the civilians living in southern Lebanon and south Beirut truly are) after the cease-fire went into effect will cost Israel even more support. The Israelis will be facing a new generation of enemies seeking revenge for the loss of loved ones, house and home.

Israel cannot continue to disregard human rights and human life and expect to achieve peace.

Kel said...

I totally agree with your summary. And I really like the look of your website.

I'll be visiting again.

Israel should never have responded in the way that she did. I think all Israelis now accept this. And Olmert's plans to disarm Hizbullah were insane. Israel didn't manage that in the eighteen years they occupied, they were hardly going to achieve it in four weeks.

My bet is that Hizbullah will not be disarmed, nor will they be sent north of the Litani. They will return to their homes. The UN resolution is not enforceable.

Who's going to do it? France? They have sent all of 400 soldiers.

And anyway, when did the victors of a war ever have to disarm to achieve ceasefire?