Showing posts with label Liars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liars. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Palin To Limbaugh: Media Wants Me To "Shut Up"

Unbelievable.

Rush Limbaugh: "The media is covering up for him. That is why there's so much admiration for you. The New York Times said you were a great speaker....your forcefulness and your opinions are driving away moderates. This is just an attempt to get you to stop."

Sarah Palin: "Well, yes, I guess that message is they do want me to sit down and shut up, but that's not gonna happen.
Then do a press conference and talk as freely as you dare and allow the press to find out what you know and don't know.

But we all know she won't do that. She'll hide until election day whilst claiming that she is being muzzled by the press.

Is there anyone on the planet who can't see through this shit?

UPDATE:

Here she uses the line she always uses towards "protesters".
"I would hope at least that protesters have the courage and the honour of thanking our veterans for giving them the right to protest."
Notice the guy come from behind to point out to her, "They just can't hear you back there, that's why they're yelling loud."



There are no protesters there at all. Experience would tell a politician when they are being heckled and when the crowd simply wants them to speak louder.

Palin has almost none. Which is why she makes such a rookie error.

Click title for full article.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

McCain campaign lashes out at NY Times over lobbying story.



The New York Times have reported that Rick Davis, who heads day-to-day operations for McCain, was paid more than $30,000 a month during a five-year period when he represented a group seeking to limit government regulation of Fannie and Freddie.

McCain, of course, has made a big deal out of how he is going to change Washington. Many of us have wondered how he is going to do this whilst employing an astonishing number of lobbyists, something which this New York Times story underlines.

The reaction of the McCain team has been to go ballistic:

In response to a question from CNN reporter Dana Bash regarding the Davis story, Steve Schmidt said: "Whatever the New York Times once was, it is today not by any standard a journalistic organisation, it is a pro-Obama advocacy organisation that every day attacks the McCain campaign, attacks Senator McCain, attacks Governor Palin and excuses Senator Obama.

"There is no level of public vetting with regard to Senator Obama's record, his background, his past statements. There is no level of outrage directed at his deceitful ads. This is an organisation that is completely, totally, 150% in the tank for the Democrat candidate."

There's also no indication, from this report at least, that Schmidt made any attempt to deny the accusation, he simply attacks the New York Times for having the temerity to report on this.

And Schmidt also challenged the charge that the McCain campaign have been lying. The only problem was that he lied as he did so.
Sen. John McCain’s top campaign aides convened a conference call today to complain of being called “liars.” They pressed the media to scrutinize specific elements of Sen. Barack Obama’s record.

But the call was so rife with simple, often inexplicable misstatements of fact that it may have had the opposite effect: to deepen the perception, dangerous to McCain, that he and his aides have little regard for factual accuracy.

The errors in McCain strategist Steve Schmidt’s charges against Obama and Sen. Joe Biden were particularly notable because they seemed unnecessary. Schmidt repeatedly gilded the lily: He exaggerated the Biden family's already problematic ties to the credit card industry; Obama’s embarrassing relationship with a 1960s radical; and an Obama supporter’s over-the-top attack on Sarah Palin when — in each case — the truth would have been damaging enough.
The truth is that Obama held back from using the "L" word for an awful long time as the McCain campaign lied repeatedly and consistently, even after it had been pointed out to them that what they were saying was untrue.

Indeed, it was not until newspapers started openly calling McCain a liar that Obama collected together a pile of newspaper quotes to make an ad suggesting that McCain was lying. Obama was very careful that the charge in the commercial came from the mouths of others and not for himself, so Schmidt's central charge is, in itself, another lie.

The truth is that the press allowed the McCain camp to tell blatant lies for the longest time. It was only because the McCain camp broke with protocol - and continued lying even after it was pointed out to them that they were lying - which enraged in the press into vocalising what many of us on the blogs had been saying for weeks and weeks. The McCain camps disregard for the truth is simply without precedent.

All campaigns spin and exagerate, the difference is that, once it is pointed out to them that they have been rumbled, they usually drop the subject and move on. They never apologise, they never withdraw what they said, but they are usually careful never to say it again.

McCain and Palin have broken that code. From the Bridge to Nowhere to Obama's tax plans they have continued to lie long after the lie was pointed out to them.

There was inevitably going to be a backlash. McCain was telling the press that what they printed didn't matter. The press have egos too and so they hit back. Schmidt's latest petulant outburst implies that the McCain camp have realised that what the press print does have a bearing on things which they hitherto denied.

Schmidt's mistake is to lash out at the press and attempt to make them the story. It's far too late in the day for that to stick. The McCain camp, at this point, simply look desperate. As I have no doubt that they are.

They were willing to do and say anything to win. And now it looks as if that strategy is what is boxing them in. And they are furious and lashing out at everyone and everything. It really is an unedifying spectacle.

Hat tip to Balloon Juice.

Click title for full article.

Friday, September 19, 2008

John McCain and the Lying Game

It is simply unprecedented. I have never known any election in which so many serious newspapers have called one of the candidates a liar.

I caught the first rumblings of this when The New York Times openly called McCain on his campaign's dishonesty, but since then it's turned into an avalanche with Time magazine being the latest to join the fray and they are saying what I have always said. Usually when a candidate lies and is caught, they never apologise, but they also don't repeat the lie. What's astonishing about both McCain and Palin is that they continue to tell lies long after what they are saying has been proven to be false.

McCain's lies have ranged from the annoying to the sleazy, and the problem is in both degree and kind. His campaign has been a ceaseless assault on his opponent's character and policies, featuring a consistent—and witting—disdain for the truth. Even after 38 million Americans heard Obama say in his speech at the Democratic National Convention that he was open to offshore oil-drilling and building new nuclear-power plants, McCain flatly said in his acceptance speech that Obama opposed both. Normal political practice would be for McCain to say, "Obama says he's 'open to' offshore drilling, but he's always opposed it. How can we believe him?" This persistence in repeating demonstrably false charges is something new in presidential politics.

Worse than the lies have been the smears. McCain ran a television ad claiming that Obama favored "comprehensive" sex education for kindergartners. (Obama favored a bill that would have warned kindergartners about sexual predators and improper touching.) The accusation that Obama was referring to Sarah Palin when he said McCain's effort to remarket his economic policies was putting "
lipstick on a pig" was another clearly misleading attack — an obnoxious attempt to divert attention from Palin's lack of fitness for the job and the recklessness with which McCain chose her. McCain's assault on the "élite media" for spreading rumors about Palin's personal life — actually, the culprits were a few bloggers and the tabloid press — was more of the same. And that gets us close to the real problem here. The McCain camp has decided that its candidate can't win honorably, on the issues, so it has resorted to transparent and phony diversions.
And the conclusion that Time magazine have arrived at is devastating:
John McCain has raised serious questions about whether he has the character to lead the nation. He has defaced his beloved military code of honor. He has run a dirty campaign.
Ouch! But McCain deserves nothing less than our disgust. He has run the most dishonest campaign of my lifetime. And I am delighted that the press are calling him on it.

Click title for full Time article.

Kudlow blames "Liberal guilt consciences" for present crisis.



Here's why the Republicans do not deserve to be re-elected. Kudlow blames the present crisis on "Liberal guilt consciences" rather than on the creeps who made fortunes selling homes to people who couldn't afford them and then sold the risk on to others.

When there's a problem one must never blame the money men as too many people associate them with the Republicans. Of course, deep down, Kudlow would love to kick the poor but that's so non-PC, so he kicks the "Liberal guilt consciences" that "forced" banks to sell these people homes, rather than the salesmen who pocketed the profit and then sold on the risk.

The Republicans are obviously aware that this financial crisis could bite them in the ass, so the blame has to be pushed towards Liberals. But this is simply too pathetic for anyone to take remotely seriously.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

FactCheck.Org: McCain "goes down new paths of deception".

FactCheck.Org have looked at McCain's Disrespectful ad and have found that it "distorts quotes" in order to make it's points and that it "goes down new paths of deception":

  • The ad says "they said she was doing 'what she was told.' " But the Obama adviser who's being quoted didn't accuse Palin of meekly following orders. What he actually said is that she made a false claim about Obama's legislative record and added, "maybe that's what she was told."

  • It says "they lashed out at Sarah Palin; dismissed her as 'good looking,' " But "they" didn't lash out at all. Obama – who is the one pictured – didn't say anything like that. The only one the McCain campaign quotes is Obama's running mate, Biden, and he actually offered the remark as a compliment. Biden said the "obvious" difference between Palin and himself is "she's good looking."

  • The ad says Obama was "disrespectful" when he accused Palin of "lying" about her record. But the truth is Palin's claim to have "said no" to the "bridge to nowhere" is indeed a dubious one, as we and many have pointed out.
McCain really is a trailblazer, but he's a trailblazer in finding new ways to distort what people say and keep the discussion as far away from policy as he possibly can.

McCain is lying on a scale which is unprecedented in modern politics. He and his running mate lie almost every day and, no matter how may times it is pointed out to them, they simply says the press are on Obama's side and continue lying.

He'll have no reputation to speak of by the time November rolls around. She's more fortunate, as she didn't have one to begin with.

Read the whole FactCheck.Org breakdown by clicking on the title.

McCain Gets Testy On Morning Joe



McCain unravels quite quickly on Morning Joe.

He begins by trying to distance himself from his own remarks yesterday that the "economy is fundamentally sound" by claiming that he was actually talking about American workers, a lie which few will believe.

But it was when Brzezinski asks McCain about an Obama ad which questioned whether or not McCain understood the fundamentals of the economy- and asked whether or not McCain regarded this as fair - that McCain suddenly went off message. I expected him to repeat that he understood the economy very well, but he instead said the American people would decide whether or not Obama's charge was fair and added:

"I still say to you, and I know you are a supporter of Senator Obama, if you would urge him to come and do town all meetings with me as I have asked him to do time after time the whole tenor of the campaign would change."
Brzezinski is visibly taken aback by this charge. Even Joe Scarborough looks shocked. Brzezinski then moves on to McCain's own ads which she describes as "twisting words" and "lies". She finishes by asking, "Isn't how candidate conducts their campaign an sign of how they will run the country?"

McCain, despite a wealth of proof to the opposite, insists that his ads are factual and ludicrously continues to argue that Obama wants to teach kids sex ed before they are taught to read.

As the interview comes to a close, Brzezinski admits that one of her brothers actually works for the McCain campaign:

"Senator," she said, "as a characterized Barack Obama supporter, I take objection. I'll just say, take care of my brother working at the campaign."

"Thanks," replied McCain, "that was a cheap shot."

Republican strategist and former McCain aide Mike Murphy later explained McCain's tone by stating that the McCain campaign feels hostile towards a media which it perceives as being against them.
"I don't think he meant it as an attack," he said. "There's definitely become a mentality inside the McCain campaign which is very hostile for anybody in the media they think is at all favorable to the other side. I think that's mistake. I think they overreact. I think doesn't do McCain well to have that mentality in the campaign. I don't really understand it because it's not his natural way."
The McCain team now think that the media are hostile because they point out the simple fact that McCain and his team are pedalling lies. I think McCain has no idea of just how hostile this is all going to get as he continues to tell lies even after it has been pointed out that he and Palin are lying.

Unlike some others I simply don't think the media are going to lie down and take this. McCain is insulting their and the American people's intelligence. This is not a good strategy.

And this is just a taste of what McCain is leaving himself open to:



McCain will need to understand that facts are simply facts. In an election you just can't get away with this nonsense.

Click title for full article.

The press and the McCain lie-fest.

I've been talking for a while now about how the press are stirring when it comes to McCain and Palin and the lies that they are telling. The press simply aren't used to having a campaign ignore them like this.

They have pointed out the fallacy of Palin's "Bridge to Nowhere" claims, but she just keeps making them, repeating the lie day after day after day. The Washington Post have gone as far as calling this "a whopper", but even that hasn't stopped Palin from repeating the lie, day after day after day.

They have dismissed McCain's lipstick claims, that Obama was actually referring to Sarah Palin, as "laughable", but McCain goes on to The View and defends the charge.

Now, as predicted, the criticism has turned into an avalanche of complaints:

St. Petersburg Times (Editorial) “Campaign of lies disgraces McCain” McCain's straight talk has become a toxic mix of lies and double-speak. It is leaving a permanent stain on his reputation for integrity, and it is a short-term strategy that eventually will backfire with the very types of independent-thinking voters that were so attracted to him.

Atlanta Journal Constitution (Jay Bookman) The volume and audacity of lies pouring from the McCain campaign is startling and even historic…That’s really something, lying straight out about a FactCheck group, knowing that you’re going to get caught but not giving a damn about it. With stuff like this, the McCain camp has cut any remaining tethers to reality and integrity and is now floating wherever the winds of illusion and whimsy may take them. It’s quite remarkable, and quite insulting to the intelligence of the American people.

Pittsburg Post Gazette (Tony Norman) Where have you gone, John McCain? You once said you'd rather lose an election than lose a war. Is it worth winning an election if it means forfeiting your soul on the altar of political expediency?...Where is the honor in reciting lies for something as transient as political advantage? What are we as voters supposed to make of political ads that accuse Barack Obama of advocating sex education for kindergartners?... Despite the intellectually dishonest maneuvering of your campaign, many Americans admire you, John McCain. Before you embraced the darkness, I was among those who disagreed with your politics, but considered you honorable. Now it's hard to look at you without seeing the scoundrels who made you what you are today.
But, despite all of the above, McCain and Palin are ignoring the press and pushing on with their dishonest claims. I've never seen anything like it in my lifetime.

It is being reported that the press corps have been dumbfounded by the way in which the McCain campaign are behaving.
The McCain press corps -- once the undisputed kings of McCainworld, with the best seats on the bus and unlimited bull sessions with the endlessly-solicitous candidate -- has, in the past couple of months, been turned into nothing so much as the campaign's Elois. Non-local reporters are sequestered in their own charter bus, separated from the Straight Talk Express, and quarantined at events. They are ordered to treat the candidates with "respect and deference," as though they were campaign secretaries. The basic function of a journalist is to ask questions -- fish swim, birds fly, reporters inquire -- but the McCain campaign no longer allows any questions, so there's not much for the traveling press to do beyond take down the minutes at event after event, publish what information the campaign deigns to provide, and bear witness to Sarah Palin's slowly-changing hairdo.
And the reporters who follow McCain are supposedly suffering from Stockholm Syndrome, such is their shock at the contempt in which they are currently held.
Why do reporters still bother to travel with McCain? Or, if we have to, why don't we rise up en masse, flout the quarantine or demand more access, an active press being fundamental to a democracy? Normally, cutting off the press poses at least the risk that reporters will turn against you. But a bit of Stockholm Syndrome has developed within the McCain press corps, a sense of awe at how deftly and brazenly the McCain campaign has rendered them useless and plugged its ears to their investigations. Reporters demolished the claim that the Palin opposed the Bridge to Nowhere, and yet the McCain campaign insolently still uses it. Writers dismantled the McCain campaign's untrue assertion that Barack Obama compared Sarah Palin to a pig yesterday, and yet the campaign put out an audacious ad featuring the ridiculous allegation, presumably on the assumption that Real Americans don't care what the elite press says anyway.
McCain's campaign is nothing if not audacious. He has decided that the press does not matter and that the truth does not matter. He will say what he wants, no matter how untrue it is or how often the press point out his untruths, because basically he believes the public are too stupid to work out what it is that he is actually doing.

I think this McCain strategy is suicidal. McCain is, understandably, living within a campaign bubble; and, even if his travelling press corps are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome, the rest of the US press corps are not.

A point of critical mass will be reached at which point the press will hit back forcibly and this will overwhelm even McCain's audacity. He is in great danger of becoming a laughing stock as his campaign is lying and, after being caught out on those lies, is refusing to stop telling them.

He's certainly breaking new ground - and there are some who think he will get away with it - but I am not of their number.

He's trying to lie his way to the White House. It won't stand. This is not the run up to the Iraq war, where challenges to one's patriotism could make the press roll over on to it's belly. The press take themselves seriously, some would charge too seriously, and they are not going to take an insult on this scale without reacting.

McCain is playing with fire and he is going to get burned. Deservedly.

He could get away with this tactic if he employed it in the last two weeks of the campaign, but there is too long to go and too many pages to be filled with stories for this not to become a running theme. McCain is simply lying, the press are starting to turn on him, and yet he continues as before.

It's unprecedented, perhaps historically so, for a candidate to behave with so little respect for the truth. And it's the height of arrogance for McCain to assume that the public aren't bright enough to see through what he is doing.

They will. The press will make sure of it.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

The Ugly New McCain

I've written quite a lot recently about the stirrings in the press against the dishonesty which has become rampant throughout John McCain's campaign.

Well, it's threatening to turn into an avalanche. In today's Washington Post Richard Cohen talks of "The Ugly New McCain" and points out:

Following his loss to George W. Bush in the 2000 South Carolina primary, John McCain did something extraordinary: He confessed to lying about how he felt about the Confederate battle flag, which he actually abhorred. "I broke my promise to always tell the truth," McCain said. Now he has broken that promise so completely that the John McCain of old is unrecognizable. He has become the sort of politician he once despised.
When one considers that, earlier on in this campaign McCain's POW status had left him almost immune to such charges, it really does say how far the McCain campaign has fallen that newspapers like The Washington Post are willing to call him so openly on the despicable campaign that he is running and just how little relationship his claims bear to the truth.

Cohen times his own eye opening to McCain's appearance on The View, which puts him several weeks behind the rest of us and only goes to show just how far McCain had to push it before everyone, including The Washington Post, caught on to the despicable campaign he is running.

The precise moment of McCain's abasement came, would you believe, not at some news conference or on one of the Sunday shows but on "The View," the daytime TV show created by Barbara Walters. Last week, one of the co-hosts, Joy Behar, took McCain to task for some of the ads his campaign has been running. One deliberately mischaracterized what Barack Obama had said about putting lipstick on a pig -- an Americanism that McCain himself has used. The other asserted that Obama supported teaching sex education to kindergarteners.

"We know that those two ads are untrue," Behar said. "They are lies."

Freeze. Close in on McCain. This was the moment. He has largely been avoiding the press. The Straight Talk Express is now just a brand, an ad slogan like "Home Cooking" or "We Will Not Be Undersold." Until then, it was possible for McCain to say that he had not really known about the ads, that the formulation "I approve this message" was just boilerplate. But he didn't.

"Actually, they are not lies," he said.

Actually, they are.

I presume, until this point, Cohen and others were prepared to cut McCain much more slack than I was, and were telling themselves that McCain possibly had no hand in the disgraceful and dishonest ads which were being aired in his name.

This, for Cohen and others, became the moment when they could no longer pretend that McCain was an innocent bystander in his own campaign. Cohen's disappointment is more keenly felt than I expected:

McCain has turned ugly. His dishonesty would be unacceptable in any politician, but McCain has always set his own bar higher than most. He has contempt for most of his colleagues for that very reason: They lie. He tells the truth. He internalizes the code of the McCains -- his grandfather, his father: both admirals of the shining sea. He serves his country differently, that's all -- but just as honorably. No more, though.

I am one of the journalists accused over the years of being in the tank for McCain. Guilty.
He then points out that he never admired McCain simply because of the accessibility he afforded to journalists, and I believe him to be sincere as he says this, but rather because he had always admired what McCain stood for: "Service to a cause greater than oneself."

There can be no doubt that Cohen was a true believer in McCain, just as there can be no doubt that McCain's actions have genuinely shaken him.
McCain has soiled all that. His opportunistic and irresponsible choice of Sarah Palin as his political heir -- the person in whose hands he would leave the country -- is a form of personal treason, a betrayal of all he once stood for. Palin, no matter what her other attributes, is shockingly unprepared to become president. McCain knows that. He means to win, which is all right; he means to win at all costs, which is not.

[...]


Karl Marx got one thing right -- what he said about history repeating itself. Once is tragedy, a second time is farce. John McCain is both.
Barack Obama said recently that McCain was prepared to lose his integrity rather than lose an election. I have always thought that he will actually lose both.

What is simply undeniable at this point is that even true believers are backing away from McCain's disgusting tactics and, when this is all over, a simple apology won't be enough to wash away the damage that McCain has done to his own good name.

Click title for full article.

Obama: Honour.



It's Obama's hardest hitting ad yet and I agree with every word of it, but it's still not as hard hitting as some of McCain's worst. It is, however, completely truthful; pointing out the almost historically untruthful campaign which McCain and Palin have indulged in.

The Obama ad went to the heart of McCain's profile. The former navy pilot has built his reputation on abiding by a code of honour in which service to the country comes before personal advancement. The Republican's campaign slogan is Country First. The decision to go after McCain's character reflects nervousness within the Obama camp over the extent of the Republican poll gains and Sarah Palin's popularity.

Obama's running mate, Joe Biden, also concentrated on McCain's personality during a speech in Saint Clair Shores, Michigan. He recalled that McCain had been the victim of scurrilous attacks during his unsuccessful battle for the Republican nomination against George Bush in 2000. "And now, some of the very same people and the tactics he once deplored his campaign now employs," Biden said.

I'm glad to see that, at last, they are prepared to attack McCain's supposed "honour", especially as he is now actively working with the very people whose actions he previously deplored when they smeared him and his family to get Bush the nomination over himself. McCain has been the victim of this kind of dishonesty, and promised to campaign with honour, which makes the way he has fought this election all the more deplorable.

I've said it before, but this campaign is the most dishonest I have ever seen in my life with McCain and Palin both repeating things which they know to be untrue.

Obama calling them on this is long overdue. Even the press have started saying that McCain is campaigning on lies. And it has to have become as obvious as the nose on your face before those buggers will call someone on it.

Click title for source.

Monday, September 15, 2008

Fox's Megyn Kelly Grills Tucker Bounds On False Tax Claims.



Even Fox News are starting to say that the McCain team are lying. Megyn Kelly states, “I want to hold you accountable for what McCain is doing,” said Kelly. “Has your candidate gone too far, has he stretched the truth with the voters?”

Bounds then implies that McCain has only been discussing Obama's voting record. Kelly isn't having it.

KELLY: But you guys have suggested he’s going to raise taxes on the middle class and virtually every independent analyst who took a look at that claim said that’s not true. He’ll raise it on people making $200,000 or $250,000, but not the middle class.
Bounds then claims that you can't take Obama at his word. So the McCain team are now making claims which border on mind reading or fortune telling. He constantly states that Obama is going to raise taxes, which even Megyn Kelly can't let him get away with.
KELLY: Let’s stay on point, I’m not giving him any credit. I’m saying what the independent analysts say. They say that claim is false. And if that’s false, why would John McCain do that Tucker? Why wouldn’t he just level with the voters and say, “look, he’s going to raise taxes on the wealthy or whatever you consider somebody to be making over $250,000, it’s going to have a trickle down effect. That may not be good for the middle class.” But why say he’s going to raise taxes on the middle class when he’s not?
Bounds is then left talking about Obama lowering oceans and healing the sick, the implication being that both those things are inherently bad. I mean, come on, who would want to lower the oceans and heal the sick? It's crazy!

But it is interesting that, as I've been saying for a couple of days now, even the press are being stirred into action by the sheer amount of demonstrable lies which the McCain team are pushing.

You simply can't lie on this scale and expect to get way with it. And when even Fox News are calling you on it, you've stepped into the Twilight Zone.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Even Rove Says McCain Is Lying.



It really is saying something when even Karl Rove, the liar behind the "McCain has a bastard child" rumour, has to admit - publicly - that McCain has gone too far.

Oh sure, he thinks it's only "a step too far" but, the very fact that McCain has woken the press into actually committing acts of journalism, tells the rest of us that McCain has been lying so much that it's become impossible to hide his lies behind any form of rhetoric. And the fact that Palin has kept lying, even after she has been called on it, certainly hasn't helped.

And now, even Rove admits as much. That, alone, tells you how bad it's become.

Lies and lies and lies....



As everyone seems to be discussing the sheer amount of lying which McCain and Palin have interjected into this campaign, it's interesting to hear what Keith and Markos have to say about this.

Keith thinks that the policy is simply to issue so many lies each day that they become impossible to disprove before the next one lands.

A Sleeping Giant Stirs...

It's very interesting that McCain's disgraceful departure from truth telling has become so blatant that he's shocked some journalists into actually engaging in journalism. This has happened because McCain's detachment from the truth, and the cavalier way he has insisted that black is white, is almost unique in American electioneering. It is a genuinely shocking display of rampant dishonesty.

We are all used to spin, to politicians presenting their plans as slightly better than they actually are, but McCain is entering new ground completely.

Until very recently he was allowing Palin to stand on public platforms and claim that she opposed "the bridge to nowhere" long after it had been shown that she had done no such thing. But with his recent insistence that Obama called Palin a pig, and that Obama wanted to teach sex education to kindergartners, McCain crossed a line and even the slothful US press have been stirred into opposing him.

This piece in The New York Times is an example of the way the press are now starting to openly call McCain a liar.

First the McCain campaign twisted Mr. Obama’s words to suggest that he had compared Gov. Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, to a pig after Mr. Obama said, in questioning Mr. McCain’s claim to be the change agent in the race, “You can put lipstick on a pig; it’s still a pig.” (Mr. McCain once used the same expression to describe Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s health plan.)

Then he falsely claimed that Mr. Obama supported “comprehensive sex education” for kindergartners (he supported teaching them to be alert for inappropriate advances from adults).

Those attacks followed weeks in which Mr. McCain repeatedly, and incorrectly, asserted that Mr. Obama would raise taxes on the middle class, even though analysts say he would cut taxes on the middle class more than Mr. McCain would, and misrepresented Mr. Obama’s positions on energy and health care.


A McCain advertisement called “Fact Check” was itself found to be “less than honest” by FactCheck.org, a nonpartisan group.
McCain has for years prided himself in being above this kind of politics, he is supposedly the man who runs the straight talk express, the guy who tells it like it is. This is mainly because McCain himself was sunk during his battle with George Bush for the Republican nomination by the tactics of Karl Rove, tactics which it appears that McCain is now prepared to use against Obama. And the first casualty in any Rovian battle plan is the truth.

Mr. McCain came into the race promoting himself as a truth teller and has long publicly deplored the kinds of negative tactics that helped sink his candidacy in the Republican primaries in 2000. But his strategy now reflects a calculation advisers made this summer — over the strenuous objections of some longtime hands who helped him build his “Straight Talk” image — to shift the campaign more toward disqualifying Mr. Obama in the eyes of voters.

“I think the McCain folks realize if they can get this thing down in the mud, drag Obama into the mud, that’s where they have the best advantage to win,” said Matthew Dowd, who worked with many top McCain campaign advisers when he was President Bush’s chief strategist in the 2004 campaign, but who has since had a falling out with the White House. “If they stay up at 10,000 feet, they don’t.”

The polls show that McCain has had success employing this tactic, but this article shows that it is a high risk strategy. Until now the press have had an astonishing soft spot for John McCain, and a built in reticence to ever criticise a man who had once been a POW. But this soft spot was also enhanced by McCain's image - deserved or not - that he was a straight talker, that he was unlike other politicians.

As McCain's campaign sinks further into the mud, his gloss is coming off, and the disappointment of some journalists is palpable.

Because of the disgraceful nature of some of his most recent ads, McCain now finds even normally neutral territory, like a visit to The View, to be places where he will be forcibly challenged.

On Friday on “The View,” generally friendly territory for politicians, one co-host, Joy Behar, criticized his new advertisements. “We know that those two ads are untrue,” Ms. Behar said. “They are lies. And yet you, at the end of it, say, ‘I approve these messages.’ Do you really approve them?”

“Actually they are not lies,” Mr. McCain said crisply, “and have you seen some of the ads that are running against me?”

McCain is playing fast and loose with the truth and there are stirrings in the press of which this article is merely the earliest indication. Within it, lies the stark warning which McCain would do well to heed:
Mr. Sipple, the Republican strategist, voiced concern that Mr. McCain’s approach could backfire. “Any campaign that is taking liberty with the truth and does it in a serial manner will end up paying for it in the end,” he said. “But it’s very unbecoming to a political figure like John McCain whose flag was planted long ago in ground that was about ‘straight talk’ and integrity.”
As Obama said only yesterday, McCain appears willing to lose his integrity rather than lose an election. But, with the press beginning to wake up to what he is doing, there is every chance that McCain will, in the end, lose both.

UPDATE:

This is a further indication of how much McCain overplayed his hand here:





It's hard to deny that the Republican put forward to defend this nonsense simply gets eaten alive.

UPDATE II:

And now the press are reporting on Palin's lies as well.
Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin made her first solo campaign appearance outside her home state Saturday, sticking largely to a speech that has boosted her popularity among Republican faithful but drawn criticism for having misstatements.

The Alaska governor repeated her claim to have killed the now-famous "Bridge to Nowhere,"
which her running mate, Arizona Sen. John McCain, has derided as wasteful pork. Palin first approved of the project. She turned against it only after it proved to be a political embarrassment.

You can't lie on the scale which these two have been doing and not expect to be called on it. And make no mistake, AP are calling Palin a liar.

Click title for full article.

Saturday, September 13, 2008

McCain-Palin lie about crowd sizes and about Palin's "visit to Iraq".

It really does seem as if lying comes as easily to the McCain campaign team as breathing.

They've been boasting about the huge crowds which have been flocking to them since they put Palin on the ticket.

The only problem is that journalists attending the events don't witness anything like the numbers which the McCain team are claiming. For example, at a recent rally in Fairfax City, Virginia, the McCain team claimed that some 23,000 people attended but Washington Post reporter Marc Fisher estimated the crowd to be a mere 8,000.

McCain aide, Kimmie Lipscomb, said that the 23,000 figure they were claiming came from an estimate by a Fire Marshal. The only problem with that claim is that the Fire Marshal says his office gave no such estimate and doesn't even monitor the size of crowds at such events.

Fairfax City Fire Marshal Andrew Wilson said his office did not supply that number to the campaign and could not confirm it. Wilson, in an interview, said the fire department does not monitor attendance at outdoor events.
But the Fairfax City Fire Marshal isn't the only person or department which the McCain team have falsely claimed verified their dubious numbers; they have even lied and claimed that the Secret Service provided some of the figures on attendance at events since Palin's inclusion on the ticket.

The Secret Service disagree:
"We didn't provide any numbers to the campaign,'' said Malcolm Wiley, a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service. Wiley said he would not "confirm or dispute'' the numbers the McCain campaign has given to reporters.
I really can't think of another campaign in my lifetime where one side put so little store by the truth.

Their adverts have been verified by independent groups as "distorting quotes" and being "misleading". Now it appears we have to suspect that they are not even telling us the truth about how many people are coming out to see them.

It also now turns out that Palin's never been to Iraq as the McCain camp previously claimed:
Aides to Gov. Sarah Palin are scrambling to explain details of her only trip outside North America -- which, according to a new report, did not include Iraq, as the McCain-Palin campaign had initially claimed.

Palin made an official visit to see Alaskan troops in Kuwait in July of 2007. There, she made a stop at a border crossing with Iraq, but did not actually visit the country, according to
a new report in the Boston Globe.

Earlier, McCain aides had said that Palin visited Iraq, and expressed indignation at questions about her slim foreign travel.

[...]

Obama aides described the new revisions to Palin's account as part of a growing pattern of deception. "The McCain campaign said Governor Palin opposed the Bridge to Nowhere, but now we know she supported it. They said she didn't seek earmarks, but now we know she hired a lobbyist to get millions in pork for her town and her state. They said she visited Iraq, but today we learned that she only stopped at the border.
Americans are starting to wonder, is there anything the McCain campaign isn't lying about?" Obama campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor asked in a statement e-mailed to reporters.
I'm certainly beginning to wonder that myself.

Liars.

That's the only way to describe such people. Every time you dig into anything they claim it turns out either not to be true or to be misconstrued. How can anyone with half a brain trust such people? I'm going to have to start compiling list of how often these buggers tell bare faced lies.

Click title for full article.

Palin: Okay, I Didn't Quite Say "Thanks, But No Thanks".



I wondered why she recently cut this claim from her stump speech. Now I know why.

She now admits that she introduced herself to the American people at the Republican Conference with a lie. What kind of person does that?

Is this the "change" that McCain wants to bring to Washington?

Obama: McCain is running the sleaziest campaign since South Carolina in 2000.

I, in my frustration, this morning demanded that Obama come off the ropes and start fighting.

Perhaps I should have visited his site before I wrote that post because Obama is way ahead of me and has started to do just that. He has released this statement after McCain's visit to The View:

"Today on "The View," John McCain defended his campaign's latest ad campaign, which has been debunked repeatedly as both false and sleazy. In running the sleaziest campaign since South Carolina in 2000 and standing by completely debunked lies on national television, it's clear that John McCain would rather lose his integrity than lose an election."
He's also released two new ads:





McCain is running the sleaziest campaign since South Carolina in 2000 and he is standing by completely debunked lies on national television. He's a liar and Obama is, at last, calling him a LIAR.

McCain would do and say anything to get elected. He would lose his integrity to win an election and, thank God, at long last, Obama is prepared to say it.

Game on.

Obama bloodied by Team McCain in electoral cage fight

Michael Tomasky has an article in this morning's Guardian newspaper about how John McCain is managing to win the battle for the daily news cycles and how, winning these battles, is helping him to win the election. At the moment the Obama campaign appears to me to be honourable, but relying far too much on the facts to win it's case.

Sadly, the appearance of Sarah Palin into this election - and the effect she has had - convinces me that Americans do not actually vote for policy; and that a candidates story - in her case the simple tale of the "hockey mom" who fights for good - has much more effect than such a thing would ever have in here Britain where we pride ourselves on our cynicism.

Obama has a great story to fit into this narrative, this guy really is the enactment of the American dream, but since winning the nomination - with the exception of a terrific acceptance speech - he's turning into a policy wonk, hoping the fact that the Republican party want to offer more of the same will be enough to win.

The figures seem to be saying the opposite and that's because McCain, through a series of scurrilous lies, is managing to keep Obama always defending and never attacking.

On the few occasions when McCain and Palin have actually been asked to answer questions their incompetence has been blatant. The selection of Palin, which is ludicrous on it's face, appears to have somehow stumped the Obama campaign. It's as if they don't want to hit this Bambi figure too hard in case they are perceived as being sexist. This is a nonsense, and it's impossible to think of either of Palin's historical precedents - Thatcher, Clinton - demanding, as McCain did in a recent ad, that any questioning of her which appeared to damage her would be grossly unfair.

She wants to be second in line to rule the free world for God's sake, she should be open to having who she is and what she believes scrutinised fully.

But, at the moment, as Tomasky points out, McCain is ruling the news cycles and he doesn't care whether what he is saying is true or not.

The McCain campaign is the news-cycle campaign. It is built around its television advertisements and attention-getting claims made on the stump that are all about winning that day's news cycle.

The basic idea is, if you win enough news cycles, you've dominated the discourse, you've manipulated the news coverage, you've gotten your message out at the other fellow's expense, you've kept him on the defensive. Do all that and you're going to win. Many of these advertisements and claims are contemptible lies (see sidebar). The nature of McCain's campaign is all the more shameful considering that he's doing many of the exact things that were done to him by George Bush's campaign in 2000 -and employing some of the self-same people who did it to him to do it to Obama.

As I write, the American political media are gently rousing themselves towards a state of backlash, and we will have to see where that leads. But as the old saying goes, a lie can get halfway around the world before the truth can even get its boots on, and so here we are.

At the moment, McCain - astonishingly in my view - is winning. He is managing to set the news cycles, even if he does so by telling astounding porkies.

The American people appear not to care, so caught up are they in the tale of the "hockey mom" and her dysfunctional family that are so like every other American family.

Obama needs to become the story rather than reacting to the stories and the lies which McCain is generating.
Since the conventions, Team McCain has kept up its barrage, daily and sometimes hourly launching new attacks and continuing to promote false claims about Palin's "record of reform" (that she opposed federal funding for a bridge that she in fact supported until it became politically unwise to do so, that she fought federal "pork-barrel" spending that she had in fact sought for her state).
Obama has, up until now, done the honourable thing and remained on the ropes taking the punches like Muhammad Ali did against George Foreman. Now, just as Ali did, it's time for Obama to come off of the ropes and start punching. Enough of the press have started to realise that McCain is pedalling terrible lies for the charge to actually hit home.

Portray him as dishonest. Portray him as someone who will say anything to gain power. Show the horrific list of flip flops that he has made. Show the choice of Palin as the reckless bid to please his base that it was.

During the battle against Clinton, Obama's greatest strength was that he redefined the parameters and did not allow the Democratic nomination to be fought along guidelines set by the Republican party and their mouthpieces. He needs to do the same here. It is not going to be enough to have the facts and all that is good and right on our side.

He needs to define the battleground and not allow this to be defined by McCain and the professional team of liars that he has assembled around him. He doesn't have to go negative, he simply has to tell the truth, as the truth - at this moment - appears to be kryptonite to McCain's fake Superman persona. If he's lying, loudly state that McCain is lying. If Palin is unfit to be Vice President to a 72 year old man who might die in office, run ads showing how she doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is to demonstrate how unready she is for the position to which McCain has recklessly elevated her.

Obama defeated the formidable Clinton political machine by inspiring us, by showing us the strength of his vision, by giving us hope.

I want to be inspired again. I want Obama to come off the ropes and to knock these two fakes into next week.

There is far too much at stake for us to worry about offending sensibilities by appearing to be rude to poor little Sarah Palin. These people are phonies, they are con artistes pretending to represent middle class values whilst acting as Trojan horses for corporate interests.

All we need to do is to show them as they are, and to stop fearing what people might say if we do so. We need to get off the ropes and start punching.

Click title for Tomasky's article.

Friday, September 12, 2008

John McCain's campaign team are LIARS.



Thank God someone has, at last, made this video. Every blogger who visits here should post it on their site.

McCain is conducting literally the most dishonest campaign of my lifetime. He and Palin continue to lie about things - even after they have been exposed as being lies - and John Feehery, a Republican strategist, has said that they will keep doing it because:

"The campaign is entering a stage in which skirmishes over the facts are less important than the dominant themes that are forming voters' opinions of the candidates."

"As long as those are out there, these little facts don't really matter."
In other words, some Americans are dumb enough to believe whatever you tell them. And that is actually John McCain's strategy. He's aiming to have the election decided by what they call "low information voters", it couldn't be more patronising unless they called you "thick" to your face.

He's lying because he believes you are too stupid to see through his lies. Please prove him wrong. A lie is a lie. And John McCain is lying more than any other presidential candidate I have ever seen.

He's lying on a disgraceful scale. If one of these ads were a description of goods in a shop, you could sue him under the Trade Descriptions Act. If he was this dishonest in his tax returns, he'd be in jail by now. But he thinks he can get away with it because he thinks you are stupid.

Let him know that you are not.

PS. We can have an effect. For example, Palin has, for the first time since she entered this campaign, dropped the lie that she told Congress, "thanks but no thanks on that Bridge to Nowhere." That's a first for her. And that's progress.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

McCain Campaign Lies About Lies.



First CBS ask that a McCain ad be taken down as it is "misleading"; and now FactCheck.org, the very people that the McCain campaign quote in their latest advert attacking Obama, have called McCain's use of their quote, "less than honest".

We don't object to people reprinting our articles. In fact, our copyright policy encourages it. But we've also asked that "the editorial integrity of the article be preserved" and told those who use our items that "you should not edit the original in such a way as to alter the message."

With its latest ad, released Sept. 10, the McCain-Palin campaign has altered our message in a fashion we consider less than honest. The ad strives to convey the message that FactCheck.org said "completely false" attacks on Gov. Sarah Palin had come from Sen. Barack Obama. We said no such thing. We have yet to dispute any claim from the Obama campaign about Palin.

They call the ad "Fact Check." It says "the attacks on Gov. Palin have been called 'completely false' ... 'misleading.' " On screen is a still photo of a grim-faced Obama. Our words are accurately quoted, but they had nothing to do with Obama.

The ad also quotes the Wall Street Journal as saying that the Obama campaign "air-dropped a mini-army of 30 lawyers, investigators and opposition researchers to dig dirt on Governor Palin." That's also a distortion. The Wall Street Journal opinion article did not say that the Obama team was there to "dig dirt." It said they were there do "dig into her record and background." Maybe the McCain-Palin campaign knows something we don't about what's in Palin's record and background.
It should also be pointed out that, since FactCheck.org printed this article, the Obama campaign have contacted them to state that no-one from the Obama campaign has been sent to Alaska. This, too, is a lie.

It's now becoming impossible surely, even for the MSM, to deny that the McCain campaign are now lying about lies.

Shamelessly and, apparently, without fear that the MSM will ever pull them up on this.

CBS takes down McCain webad, suggests it's 'misleading'.

I pointed out yesterday that YouTube had removed McCain's lipstick ad giving as it's reason:

This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by CBS Interactive Inc.
It now transpires that CBS have requested that the ad be removed because of the quote from Katie Couric which CBS acknowledges was used in a "misleading" way.

YouTube has removed a webad that casts Sarah Palin as the victim of sexism on the request of CBS, whose anchor Katie Couric was featured in the ad.

“One of the great lessons of that campaign is the continued and accepted role of sexism in American life," Couric is quoted in the ad.

In the original clip, which aired months before Palin entered the race, Couric was talking about Hillary Clinton. The ad applies her words to Palin.

Asked about the ad, CBS spokeswoman Leigh Farris said, "CBS News does not endorse any candidate in the Presidential race. Any use of CBS personnel in political advertising that suggests the contrary is misleading."

"Misleading" is actually far too polite a term for what the McCain camp have done with this ad. It really is the slimiest and most dishonest thing I have ever seen. It is the ultimate proof that McCain will literally say or do anything to get his hands on the presidency.

Only the most wilfully ignorant amongst us could pretend that they believed Obama was talking about Palin when he mentioned "lipstick on a pig". This is sheer political theatre of the very worst kind; it is, as Obama called it, a manufactured outrage.

CBS are actually calling the McCain camp out on this and stating that this advert is "misleading". That's polite talk for a gross lie. Indeed, the very way in which they stitch the three totally separate incidents together leaves one in no doubt that they are totally aware of the lie which they are manufacturing.

I am all for Obama attempting to run a campaign that avoids sinking into the kind of shameless skulduggery which McCain is indulging in, but I also think it is necessary to call a lie a lie when that is what it is.

McCain and Palin are lying their heads off and apparently doing so with impunity. This needs to stop. They need to be called out as what they are. They are liars. And the McCain camp has made it very clear that they are lying because at this point in a campaign the truth matters less than establishing a theme.

If the MSM media did their job properly McCain and Palin wouldn't have the nerve to attempt what they are doing, they would fear being laughed at and becoming figures of public ridicule.

It is a testament to how badly the MSM do their job that these two can spread this duplicity - and do so on national television - without fear of rebuke.

Is there no-one in the MSM who is going to call these two liars to account? Instead we are left with this:



That's not political coverage, that's hitting the bottom of the pond to muddy the water and avoid the fact that the Republicans have no policies. This shit suits the Republicans because it's false outrage and it avoids talking about what actually matters to voters.

This appears to me to be what always happens during US elections, it's this kind of crap which allows the Republicans to con people into voting against their own economic interests. It's utterly shameful. And so is McCain for running this utterly dishonest advert. I'll never again view him as a man of honour. Because this shameful and dishonest ad shows that he's not.

Click title for full article.