Republican Voters are Demoralised as the World Waits for Obama.
It's been evident all across the race for both parties to choose their presidential nominee. We've seen it in the huge crowds that turn out for Barack Obama compared with the tiny audiences that John McCain attracts. It's been evident in the relatively small number of Republicans who have turned out to vote for McCain when contrasted with the very large amount of people who voted for Obama or Clinton.
Bush has kicked the Republicans to the ground. He was supposed to be one of their own but he ran the country oblivious to public opinion and has left many Republicans unable to defend him or Republicanism. His personal popularity - and the amount of people, of any political persuasion, who think the country is moving in the right direction - are both at an historic low.Sixty-three percent of Democrats questioned say they are either extremely or very enthusiastic about voting this year. Only 37 percent of Republicans feel the same way, and 36 percent of Republicans say they are not enthusiastic about voting.
"Republicans are far less enthusiastic about voting than Democrats are, and enthusiasm has plummeted among GOPers since the start of the year," said Keating Holland, CNN polling director. "There was already an 'enthusiasm gap' in January, when Democrats were 11 points higher than GOPers on this measure. Now, that gap has grown to 26 points."
"Bottom line: After eight years of the Bush presidency, Republicans are demoralized," said Bill Schneider, CNN senior political analyst.
Then there's the fact that the Republicans have chosen John McCain as their candidate; a man who promises more of the same failed Bush policies and isn't extreme enough to please the rabid Republican base.
It's really not a very good year for their party so I can understand why many of them have simply lost interest in this years election.
One of their own has badly let them down, and his successor is promising more of the same failed policies. What's to get excited about there?
It all looks good, at this point, for an Obama landslide.In the battle for Congress, 54 percent of those questioned say they would vote for the Democrat in their congressional district, with 44 percent saying they'd vote for the Republican candidate.
"Democrats lead Republicans by 10 points in the congressional vote. At this point in 2006, the Democratic lead was seven points. Democrats went on to win a landslide in 2006," Schneider said.
Which is good news for the rest of the world who, according to a new study by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center, are all wanting to see Barack Obama made the new American president.
People around the globe widely expect the next American president to improve the country's policies toward the rest of the world, especially if Barack Obama is elected, yet they retain a persistently poor image of the U.S., according to a poll released Thursday.Bush's presidency has been an unqualified disaster, certainly in terms of how the US is viewed by the rest of the world. I have never known anti-Americanism to be as prevalent in Europe as it has been during the arrogant times of Bush and Cheney. It says a lot that Bush is coming to London this weekend and that Downing Street are playing it down to such an extent that one would be forgiven for not even knowing that he is here.
Andrew Kohut, president of Pew, said many seem to be hoping the U.S. role in the world will improve with the departure of President Bush, who remains profoundly unpopular almost everywhere.
"People think the U.S. wants to run the world," said Kohut. "It's not more complicated than that."
However, even though they are refusing to release any itinerary for the visit for fear of public outrage, they have nevertheless tried to ban any protest near parliament.
Even though Bush is a lame duck President, his actions have been so despicable that he continues to encounter loathing and disapprobation wherever he goes.Protesters need permission to march near parliament and the police have told the campaigners that their march will not be allowed.
A Stop the War spokesman said: "It seems that when George Bush visits this country, traditional rights of assembly and movement are removed from the people.
"This would be unacceptable for the visit of any foreign leader, but for this one - a war criminal - it is doubly unacceptable and we will defy the ban."
With McCain offering more of the same, it's no wonder that the Republicans feel disheartened.
Click title for full article.
5 comments:
Bush has kicked the Republicans to the ground. He was supposed to be one of their own but he ran the country oblivious to public opinion and has left many Republicans unable to defend him or Republicanism.
I respectfully disagree with you here, Kel.
The trouble is that Bush really is "one of their own". He still has 75% support of Republicans, and those that disapprove of him really fault him for not going further to the Right.
Bush had a compliant Congress, a lapdog Media, all of his funding requests were granted, every police-state measure was approved...and still the programme failed. Bush is just a ventriloquist dummy for the neocons, and now Bush is taking the heat for following their programme to the letter.
The Republicans have given it their best shot, and it has been a dismal failure. Nothing has worked out as they planned, and it's obvious that the world doesn't work as they thought it did in their artificial reality.
It would be a mistake to blame Bush alone for the fundamental failure of the neo-con agenda. He was just following orders.
Bush couldnt have done it alone. The Republican Party was behind most of his policies (as was a disturbingly large portion of the Democrats), and now they pay the price for their actions. Good riddance to them! The problem with the Republican Party was not that it was conservative, but that is was criminal and facistic.
The trouble is that Bush really is "one of their own". He still has 75% support of Republicans
Todd, is he really supported by that many? I keep reading that some 78% of Americans disapprove of the direction he's taken the country and assume this must have eaten into at least some of their base.
It would be a mistake to blame Bush alone for the fundamental failure of the neo-con agenda.
Sorry, I never meant to lay the blame simply at the door of Bush, I was actually thinking of the entire neo-con mindset which has taken over that party.
They have had - as you say - a totally compliant Congress and have utterly fucked it up. And they have, literally, no-one but themselves to blame. They got to do exactly what they wanted and it was a catastrophe.
The problem with the Republican Party was not that it was conservative, but that is was criminal and facistic.
I agree totally. And the crime of the Democrats was not impeaching the bugger as he wilfully violated the law.
Todd, is he really supported by that many?
Ah, well, my numbers were a bit outdated. The latest polls show 68% support of Republicans.
However, the number of people who self-identify as Republicans has been steadily declining, so it's 68% of a significantly smaller number than a few years ago.
The salient point is, though, that those disaffected Republicans are the extreme right of their Party. "Moderate Republicans", IMHO, are just "anti-Democrats" and continue to support Bush because the alternative is too frightening for them to bear. They are the victims of Fox News and talk-radio bozos.
The salient point is, though, that those disaffected Republicans are the extreme right of their Party. "Moderate Republicans", IMHO, are just "anti-Democrats" and continue to support Bush because the alternative is too frightening for them to bear. They are the victims of Fox News and talk-radio bozos.
I hear you Doug. I've read about how disaffected Malkin and Coulter are about McCain. And it's because he's not right wing enough for them!
And as for the general anti-Democrats, we had that problem over here for years with Tories frightening the public against voting Labour by reminding them of the winter of discontent etc and rampant union power.
Of course the tragedy is that what brought them around was Tony Blair who then proceeded to give them ten years of Tory-lite.
Post a Comment