Saturday, March 08, 2008

It's 3 a.m. Who do you want answering the phone?

There's a fascinating article over at Salon which states that many military leaders, whilst greatly admiring John McCain, simply don't want him as commander in chief because of that legendary temper of his:

It is not difficult in Washington to find high-level military officials who have had close encounters with John McCain's temper, and who find it worrisome. Politicians sometimes scream for effect, but the concern is that McCain has, at times, come across as out of control. It is difficult to find current or former officers willing to describe those encounters in detail on the record. That's because, by and large, those officers admire McCain. But that doesn't mean they want his finger on the proverbial button, and they are supporting Clinton or Obama instead.

"I like McCain. I respect McCain. But I am a little worried by his knee-jerk response factor," said retired Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, who was in charge of training the Iraqi military from 2003 to 2004 and is now campaigning for Clinton. "I think it is a little scary. I think this guy's first reactions are not necessarily the best reactions. I believe that he acts on impulse."

Nor do the people quoted in this article favour Hillary, unless you are offering her as the only option to McCain:

Most recently, Wayne has been studying Clinton's personality. "I just gave a presentation on Hillary's temperament for the presidency. I came to the conclusion that it is not really a good presidential temperament, with one caveat -- if you compare it with McCain's."

It's strange. Hillary recently, and rather offensively, stated that both she and John McCain had crossed "the commander-in-chief threshold" whilst hinting very unsubtly that Obama had not. I thought this disgraceful, Democrats should not be comparing other Democrats unfavourably against Republican rivals.

However, it appears that the people who disagree with her assessment are members of the military itself. They appear not to want Clinton or McCain.

"I studied leadership for a long time during 32 years in the military," said retired Air Force Maj. Gen. Scott Gration, a one-time Republican who is supporting Obama. "It is all about character. Who can motivate willing followers? Who has the vision? Who can inspire people?" Gration asked. "I have tremendous respect for John McCain, but I would not follow him."

"One of the things the senior military would like to see when they go visit the president is a kind of consistency, a kind of reliability," explained retired Gen. Merrill McPeak, a former Republican, former chief of staff of the Air Force and former fighter pilot who flew 285 combat missions. McPeak said his perception is that Obama is "not that up when he is up and not that down when he is down. He is kind of a steady Eddie. This is a very important feature," McPeak said. On the other hand, he said, "McCain has got a reputation for being a little volatile." McPeak is campaigning for Obama.

So, steady Eddie is preferable to some people than McCain or Clinton. So much for crossing the commander-in-chief threshold...



Click title for full article.

No comments: