Thursday, March 27, 2008

Iraq implodes as Shia fights Shia

Fresh in-fighting is breaking out in Iraq with Shia fighting Shia for the first time.

A new civil war is threatening to explode in Iraq as American-backed Iraqi government forces fight Shia militiamen for control of Basra and parts of Baghdad.

Heavy fighting engulfed Iraq's two largest cities and spread to other towns yesterday as the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, gave fighters of the Mehdi Army, led by the radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, 72 hours to surrender their weapons.

The gun battles between soldiers and militiamen, who are all Shia Muslims, show that Iraq's majority Shia community – which replaced Saddam Hussein's Sunni regime – is splitting apart for the first time.

Mr Sadr's followers believe the government is trying to eliminate them before elections in southern Iraq later this year, which they are expected to win.
However, that's not how George Bush has chosen to see the situation. He's decided that what we are looking at is actually a positive development.
In an interview with The Times, he backed the Iraqi Government’s decision to “respond forcefully” to the spiralling violence by “criminal elements” and Shia extremists in Basra. “It was a very positive moment in the development of a sovereign nation that is willing to take on elements that believe they are beyond the law,” the President said.
I know that Bush has spent the last five years attempting to sell the war in Iraq as a resounding success, when most of us see it as the very opposite, but even by his standards of Machiavellian spin, selling this as a positive must be some kind of a new low:

Mortars and rockets launched from Mehdi Army-controlled districts of Baghdad struck the Green Zone, the seat of American power in Iraq, for the third day yesterday, seriously wounding three Americans. Two rockets hit the parking lot of the Iraqi cabinet. The mixed area of al-Mansur in west Baghdad, where shops had begun to reopen in recent months, was deserted yesterday as Mehdi Army fighters were rumoured among local people to be moving in from the nearby Shia stronghold of Washash. "We expect an attack by the Shia in spite of the Americans being spread over Sunni districts to defend them," said a Sunni resident.

Forty people have been killed and at least 200 injured in Basra in the last two days of violence. In the town of Hilla, south of Baghdad, 11 people were killed and 18 injured yesterday by a US air strike called in support of Iraqi forces following street battles with Shia militia members in the city's Thawra neighbourhood. In Baghdad, 14 have been killed and 140 wounded.

The supporters of Mr Sadr, who form the largest political movement in Iraq, blame the Americans for giving the go-ahead for Mr Maliki's offensive against them and supporting it with helicopters and bomber aircraft. US troops have sealed off Sadr City, the close-packed slum in the capital with a population that is the main bastion of the Sadrists, while the Mehdi Army has taken over its streets, establishing checkpoints, each manned by about 20 heavily armed men. It is unlikely that the militiamen in Basra will surrender as demanded by the government. Sadiq al-Rikabi, an adviser to Mr Maliki, said those who kept their weapons would be arrested. "Any gunman who does not do that within three days will be an outlaw."

So, Bush is backing a plan to take on the Mehdi Army ahead of fresh elections, elections which Muqtada al-Sadr believes he will win. The Mehdi Army have been engaged in a ceasefire with the US up until now, so this latest development is one that it is very hard to see in a positive light.

The US are claiming that their fight is not actually against the Mehdi Army:
"This is not a battle against the [Mehdi Army] nor is it a proxy war between the United States and Iran," said a US military spokesman, Major General Kevin Bergner. "It is [the] government of Iraq taking the necessary action to deal with criminals on the streets."
The Mehdi Army appear to disagree with that notion. And there are very few Iraqi's who buy into that thesis either, with Sunnis expressing their delight that the US/Iraq forces are finally tackling the Mehdi Army.

I find it hard to see this development as a "very positive" one.

Click title for full article.

2 comments:

Vigilante said...

Interesting. I always thought that Sadr always represented one of the essential building blocks necessary for the reconstruction of an Iraqi state. The Occupiers' assault on the Mahdi Army seems counter-indicated. Unless USA's intent is not to rebuild and get Iraq back on its feet, but to make it more dependent on a longer occupation.

Kel said...

It is an astonishing development isn't it? I can only think that Maliki feels he no longer needs al Sadr and wants to get him out of the way before the elections.