Chuck's Senate
By Marc Ash.
Click title for source.On the day that Senator Charles Schumer used his vote on the Senate Judiciary Committee to all but assure that George W. Bush's latest pick, Michael B. Mukasey for attorney general, would be confirmed, The New York Times obliged him by publishing - in a featured Op-Ed - his reasons for doing so. The Times did not see fit to publicize any other senator's thoughts on the matter. That is fitting, because the only voice that mattered in the end was Chuck Schumer's.
In his Op-Ed, Schumer spelled out numerous reasons for his decision. He appears to argue that Mukasey can help to turn around and repair a Department of Justice badly damaged by Bush's last two picks: John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales. All this would be possible, in Schumer's view, due to Mukasey's independence from George W. Bush, and his professionalism. Mukasey's testimony, of course, clearly indicated he was - as is always a prerequisite for Bush appointees - first a guardian of Mr. Bush's interests, and perhaps after that a guardian of the nation's interests. Make no mistake. Michael Mukasey will serve at the pleasure of the president.
When Mukasey says that he will enforce a law banning waterboarding, "if Congress passes one," he is saying several things: a) That torture does not exist. Because if waterboarding is not torture, then nothing is. b) That torture is not currently illegal under US law, or that each act of violence against a detainee has to be specifically deemed to be illegal, whichever you prefer. c) That no one in Mr. Bush's entourage can be held responsible legally for authorizing acts of torture, which is what international law, and the Geneva Conventions - to which the United States is a signatory - require. d) That both he and Mr. Bush are supremely confident that Congress would never dare to pass legislation confirming that torture is illegal under US law.
This is a darker day still. In addition to personally making the decision that Michael Mukasey would be confirmed, Schumer now leads Congress by proxy to ratify torture as legal under US law, by virtue of its inaction. Game, set, match: Bush, Mukasey and Schumer.
One reason that Republicans can get away with whatever they like is that, in the end, they always stick together. Some call it lockstep, others call it goose step, but whatever you call it, they don't break ranks. Democrats do - regardless of the consequences. In this case, Mr. Schumer played the role of the powerbroker fatale. It was Schumer who assured the White House that, if nominated, Mukasey would be confirmed. So Schumer promised, and so he delivered.
Congress, the Democrats and the Nation be damned.
2 comments:
That Mukasey was always intended to be Bush's Tool could have been quite easily verified by simply refusing to confirm him. At that point, Bush would have done a recess appointment, indicating that he wanted Mukasey for his enabler all along. Nothing would have changed in terms of who was doing what in the administration, but everything would have changed in terms of political message. Alas, another chance at moral responsibility squandered (or refused) by the Democrats.
Dave,
The Democrats sicken me. There always appears to be some of them willing to splinter away and give Bush what he wants. As you say, a recess appointment would have given Bush what he wanted without the Democrats having to give Mukasey their confirmation.
But, typically, some Democrats always fold their hands.
Post a Comment