Wednesday, November 28, 2007

America in the Time of Empire

I am too busy to post much today but I came across this in Truthdig which is well worth reading:

All great empires and nations decay from within. By the time they hobble off the world stage, overrun by the hordes at the gates or vanishing quietly into the pages of history books, what made them successful and powerful no longer has relevance. This rot takes place over decades, as with the Soviet Union, or, even longer, as with the Roman, Ottoman or Austro-Hungarian empires. It is often imperceptible.

Dying empires cling until the very end to the outward trappings of power. They mask their weakness behind a costly and technologically advanced military. They pursue increasingly unrealistic imperial ambitions. They stifle dissent with efficient and often ruthless mechanisms of control. They lose the capacity for empathy, which allows them to see themselves through the eyes of others, to create a world of accommodation rather than strife. The creeds and noble ideals of the nation become empty cliches, used to justify acts of greater plunder, corruption and violence. By the end, there is only a raw lust for power and few willing to confront it.

The most damning indicators of national decline are upon us. We have watched an oligarchy rise to take economic and political power. The top 1 percent of the population has amassed more wealth than the bottom 90 percent combined, creating economic disparities unseen since the Depression. If Hillary Rodham Clinton becomes president, we will see the presidency controlled by two families for the last 24 years.

Massive debt, much of it in the hands of the Chinese, keeps piling up as we fund absurd imperial projects and useless foreign wars. Democratic freedoms are diminished in the name of national security. And the erosion of basic services, from education to health care to public housing, has left tens of millions of citizens in despair. The displacement of genuine debate and civil and political discourse with the noise and glitter of public spectacle and entertainment has left us ignorant of the outside world, and blind to how it perceives us. We are fed trivia and celebrity gossip in place of news.

An increasing number of voices, especially within the military, are speaking to this stark deterioration. They describe a political class that no longer knows how to separate personal gain from the common good, a class driving the nation into the ground.

“There has been a glaring and unfortunate display of incompetent strategic leadership within our national leaders,” retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, the former commander of forces in Iraq, recently told the New York Times, adding that civilian officials have been “derelict in their duties” and guilty of a “lust for power.”

The American working class, once the most prosperous on Earth, has been politically disempowered, impoverished and abandoned. Manufacturing jobs have been shipped overseas. State and federal assistance programs have been slashed. The corporations, those that orchestrated the flight of jobs and the abolishment of workers’ rights, control every federal agency in Washington, including the Department of Labor. They have dismantled the regulations that had made the country’s managed capitalism a success for ordinary men and women. The Democratic and Republican Parties now take corporate money and do the bidding of corporate interests.

Philadelphia is a textbook example. The city has seen a precipitous decline in manufacturing jobs, jobs that allowed households to live comfortably on one salary. The city had 35 percent of its workforce employed in the manufacturing sector in 1950, perhaps the zenith of the American empire. Thirty years later, this had fallen to 20 percent. Today it is 8.8 percent. Commensurate jobs, jobs that offer benefits, health care and most important enough money to provide hope for the future, no longer exist. The former manufacturing centers from Flint, Mich., to Youngstown, Ohio, are open sores, testaments to a growing internal collapse.

The United States has gone from being the world’s largest creditor to its largest debtor. As of September 2006, the country was, for the first time in a century, paying out more than it received in investments. Trillions of dollars go into defense while the nation’s infrastructure, from levees in New Orleans to highway bridges in Minnesota, collapses. We spend almost as much on military power as the rest of the world combined, while Social Security and Medicare entitlements are jeopardized because of huge deficits. Money is available for war, but not for the simple necessities of daily life.

Nothing makes these diseased priorities more starkly clear than what the White House did last week. On the same day, Tuesday, President Bush vetoed a domestic spending bill for education, job training and health programs, yet signed another bill giving the Pentagon about $471 billion for the fiscal year that began Oct. 1. All this in the shadow of a Joint Economic Committee report suggesting that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have been twice as expensive than previously imagined, almost $1.5 trillion.

The decision to measure the strength of the state in military terms is fatal. It leads to a growing cynicism among a disenchanted citizenry and a Hobbesian ethic of individual gain at the expense of everyone else. Few want to fight and die for a Halliburton or an Exxon. This is why we do not have a draft. It is why taxes have not been raised and we borrow to fund the war. It is why the state has organized, and spends billions to maintain, a mercenary army in Iraq. We leave the fighting and dying mostly to our poor and hired killers. No nationwide sacrifices are required. We will worry about it later.

It all amounts to a tacit complicity on the part of a passive population. This permits the oligarchy to squander capital and lives. It creates a world where we speak exclusively in the language of violence. It has plunged us into an endless cycle of war and conflict that is draining away the vitality, resources and promise of the nation.

It signals the twilight of our empire.

By Chris Hedges

This column was originally published by the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Click title for source.

4 comments:

GD said...

The Roman Empire fell because the bottom fell out of the Roman economy while the outside economies grew. The bottom fell out on Rome because "growth" was for centuries based on expropriating slaves from conquered peoples, and that ran out. Outlying economies benefited from adopting Roman technology and military training. Eventually the odds evened, and Rome as a power crumbled.

We've got a couple more streams of expropriation than Rome did. But cheap oil is already drying up. If the Third World wises up to the intellectual property or green revolution hustles, our elite power system will be in big time trouble.

Kel said...

Kingfish,

Rome also made conquered people citizens of Rome, enjoying Rome's protection.

As long as the Soviet Union stood that was sort of the deal for those of us living under America's shadow. With the USSR gone, the need for American protection has waned, which was the main advantage of the American Empire.

Then there's the underwriting of American debt mainly by China, America's upcoming economic rival, and the fact that America is now a net importer; as opposed to the halcyon days following WWII when America produced over half of the world's goods. The truth is that the US's position in the world is currently underwritten by America consumerism. We manufacture and you buy.

That safeguards you to an extent because if you collapse so do we.

However, one of the things in the article that I do agree with is that America's military expenditure, when compared with the next God knows how many countries, is ridiculously excessive. And it is done at the expense of looking after the US's own working class population, who used to be the most prosperous on Earth.

And the greatest thing that kept America on top of the pile - by almost universal consent - were the principles that your country stood for. Principles that the world needed America to uphold as an example for all.

However, those principles are greatly undermined by the cynical use of the language of "liberation" for acts of blatant violence such as the invasion of Iraq.

And when we now find what Reagan called "the shining city on the hill" debating whether or not waterboarding constitutes torture, then it's no great surprise that US popularity throughout the world is in freefall.

All is not lost and I have great confidence that the US electorate will - at the next opportunity - correct this shameful period in your nation's history by rejecting this foul neo-conservative ideology.

However, Bush has greatly weakened your nation's reputation in more ways than one. Few of us, several years ago, believed that the US military machine was unable to enforce whatever the US wanted by the sheer force of it's military superiority.

Afghanistan and Iraq have proven that not to be the case.

To be fair to the US, I think your people are too noble to ever run a proper Empire, which is why your Republican politicians always have to lie to convince most Americans to follow their foreign policies.

Empire is not really in America's soul. If only someone could explain that to the Republicans. Americans have led the world because most of the world has agreed with America doing so. It has suited all of us, because deep down most of the planet agrees with the ideology America is espousing.

The Bush years have been a dangerous aberration and the collapse of support for the US around the world - even amongst the populations of allies - is proof that we support America because of her principles. When she doesn't stand for those same principles that we all admire her for, we are left wondering what America is for.

And that's dangerous, for all of us.

Unknown said...

Great work! My, my. Impressive narratives, both in the Philadelphia Enquirer article and in the comments above.

Kel said...

I posted that article because it really does hit a few home truths...