Blaming The Media For Bad War News

Top officials in the Bush administration have often complained that news coverage of Iraq focuses on negative events too much and fails to devote enough attention to positive developments. Yet the White House has rarely picked direct fights with U.S. media outlets during this war. For the most part, President Bush leaves it to others to scapegoat the media.

Karl Rove's spin strategy is heavily reliant on surrogates. They're likely to escalate blame-the-media efforts as this year goes on.

A revealing moment -- dramatizing the pro-war division of labor -- came on Wednesday, during Bush's nationally televised appearance in Wheeling, West Virginia. On the surface, the format resembled a town hall, but the orchestration was closer to war rally. (According to White House spokesperson Scott McClellan, the local Chamber of Commerce had distributed 2,000 tickets while a newspaper in the community gave out 100.) It fell to a woman who identified herself as being from Columbus, Ohio, to give the Wheeling event an anti-media jolt.

Her husband -- who was an Army officer in Iraq, where "his job while serving was as a broadcast journalist" -- "has returned from a 13-month tour in Tikrit," she said. And then came the populist punch: "He has brought back several DVDs full of wonderful footage of reconstruction, of medical things going on. And I ask you this from the bottom of my heart for a solution to this, because it seems that our major media networks don't want to portray the good."

She added: "They just want to focus ... on another car bomb or they just want to focus on some more bloodshed or they just want to focus on how they don't agree with you and what you're doing, when they don't even probably know how you're doing what you're doing anyway. But what can we do to get that footage on CNN, on Fox, to get it on Headline News, to get it on the local news?... It portrays the good. And if people could see that, if the American people could see it, there would never be another negative word about this conflict."

The audience punctuated the woman's statement with very strong applause and then a standing ovation. But rather than pile on, Bush adopted an air of restraint.

"Just got to keep talking," he advised. "Word of mouth, there's blogs, there's Internet, there's all kinds of ways to communicate, which is literally changing the way people are getting their information. And so if you're concerned, I would suggest that you reach out to some of the groups that are supporting the troops, that have gotten Internet sites, and just keep the word moving. And that's one way to deal with an issue without suppressing a free press. We will never do that in America."

In effect, Bush is holding the coat of those who go after the news media on his behalf.

I touched on this the other yesterday, the way the Bush camp seem determined to portray Iraq as a presentation problem, rather than as the disaster it is.

It reminds me of Thatcher at the height of her unpopularity endlessly saying that she wasn't able to get her message across - rather than acknowledge the simple truth that we heard her message but we ardently disagreed.

As I pointed out yesterday, Bush has now gone as far as to label telling the truth about Iraq as aiding al Qaeda.

Republicans will go to any lengths to avoid responsibility for what we all warned them was an act of madness.

The idea that a nation who had suffered twelve years of punative sanctions, resulting in the deaths of half a million babies, would welcome their invaders (and the people who imposed the sanctions) as "liberators" was fantasical.

That fantasy alone illustrates how removed from reality these neo-cons are.

Related Articles:

Following Bush's lead, conservatives mounted offensive against "biased" Iraq war coverage

Scarborough said Arab-American pollster Zogby "may be biased" on Iraq war and "the Middle East situation"

Cafferty Smacks Down Kurtz - Video Link. Good Stuff! Point Well Put.

Cindy Sheehan on Bush's Incoherance